[ PICTOGRAM CASE HISTORY ]
Material Symbols Vaping Rooms.
Outlined icon
Usable with support
Visible referent: vaping rooms. Intended message: The icon must communicate Vaping Rooms in a digital interface.. The report separates observed asset evidence, submitted context, and public evidence signals.
0.69
PCS
0.39
CLL
0.51
NTR
[ FEATURED PICTOGRAM ]
pictoclarity / material-symbols-vaping-rooms-outlined
Output - Material Symbols Vaping Rooms Icon (Outlined)
Assessing the communicative effectiveness of the Vaping Rooms icon
This reviewed catalog report estimates clarity for Vaping Rooms in default interface contexts. Scores are screening estimates and do not replace user testing.
0.69
PCS
PictoClarity Score
0.39
CLL
Convention Learning Load
0.51
NTR
Neurocognitive Transfer Risk
[ HOW THE CASE READS ]
From Input To Public Evidence.
The application stores structured evidence. The public page turns it into a readable pictogram case history.
01
Submitted Context
Framework output for the Material Symbols Vaping Rooms icon in the outlined style.
02
Primary Finding
Primary referent: vaping rooms.
03
Metric Reading
Implied function: The icon must communicate Vaping Rooms in a digital interface..
04
Public Recommendation
Run representative user testing before publication.
[ EVIDENCE SCREENING ]
What The Estimate Surfaces.
Semantic Transparency Score
Input
Expected
Estimated
0.57
Confusion Risk Index
Input
Possible
Estimated
0.57
Readability Test Score
Input
Visual
Estimated
0.79
PictoClarity Score
Input
Estimated
Estimated
0.69
Usable with support 0.69
The pictogram works with labels or context. The estimate applies to this pictogram, this meaning, and this public context.
Last Reviewed
Jun 24, 2026
[ SCORE SCALE ]
The Public Verdict Has A Range.
The level explains the estimated context. It is not a certification.
0.80-1.00
Strong clarity
The pictogram communicates well in this context.
Use it, then keep testing with real users.
0.65-0.79
Usable with support
Current report
The pictogram works with labels or context.
Pair it with text and monitor interpretation.
0.50-0.64
Needs intervention
The pictogram carries meaningful clarity risk.
Improve the symbol before relying on it.
0.00-0.49
Not reliable
The pictogram does not communicate enough alone.
Replace it or add strong alternative support.
[ CONVERGENCE PROFILE ]
Where Meaning Converges.
The profile compares visual evidence, semantic extraction, cultural recognition, time, and cognitive context. It describes estimated convergence, not universal validity.
Convergent meaning profile
The radar shows where meaning converges. It does not certify universal validity.
Area
0.37
Balance
0.82
Perceptual
0.78
Semantic
0.57
Functional
0.66
Cultural
0.52
Temporal
0.69
Neurocognitive
0.56
Context Independence
0.61
Collective Resonance
0.50
Weakest Axis
Collective Resonance
How strongly public evidence supports shared recognition and persistence.
Strongest Axis
Perceptual Convergence
How strongly visual form survives size, blur, contrast, and detail loss.
| Axis | Score | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Perceptual Convergence | 0.78 | How strongly visual form survives size, blur, contrast, and detail loss. |
| Semantic Convergence | 0.57 | How strongly extracted meaning converges on one interpretation. |
| Functional Convergence | 0.66 | How strongly the symbol maps to the intended function. |
| Cultural Convergence | 0.52 | How strongly recognition holds across cultural evidence and assumptions. |
| Temporal Convergence | 0.69 | How strongly meaning persists over time without semantic decay. |
| Neurocognitive Convergence | 0.56 | How strongly the symbol follows AAC pictogram reading: transparent referent, concrete action, low convention load, and support. |
| Context Independence | 0.61 | How strongly meaning survives without external labels or placement cues. |
| Collective Resonance | 0.50 | How strongly public evidence supports shared recognition and persistence. |
Evidence Notes.
8 Findings Published
Evidence
Primary referent: vaping rooms.
Evidence
Implied function: The icon must communicate Vaping Rooms in a digital interface..
Evidence
Metaphor type: functional.
Evidence
Functional meaning: The icon must communicate Vaping Rooms in a digital interface..
Evidence
PCS total: 0.69.
Evidence
Weakest convergence axis: Collective Resonance.
Evidence
Evidence warning: Annual Wikimedia Pageviews failed for "vaping icon comprehension": HTTP 404.
Evidence
Evidence warning: Annual Wikimedia Pageviews failed for "vaping rooms": HTTP 404.
[ TRANSFER / METRIC CHART ]
Public evidence trend
The chart shows public evidence buckets by evidence year. Cohort breakpoints appear only when an aging referent is active.
Public evidence trend
Evidence year: 2026
Evaluation
Reference point.
X axis: Evidence year
| Evidence year | Semantic Transparency | Cultural Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.46 | 0.31 |
| 1997 | 0.51 | 0.24 |
| 1998 | 0.51 | 0.31 |
| 1999 | 0.52 | 0.24 |
| 2000 | 0.46 | 0.24 |
| 2001 | 0.53 | 0.24 |
| 2002 | 0.48 | 0.24 |
| 2003 | 0.52 | 0.24 |
| 2004 | 0.50 | 0.24 |
| 2005 | 0.49 | 0.24 |
| 2006 | 0.50 | 0.24 |
| 2007 | 0.51 | 0.24 |
| 2008 | 0.56 | 0.35 |
| 2009 | 0.54 | 0.24 |
| 2010 | 0.54 | 0.31 |
| 2011 | 0.57 | 0.31 |
| 2012 | 0.59 | 0.35 |
| 2013 | 0.57 | 0.44 |
| 2014 | 0.64 | 0.46 |
| 2015 | 0.69 | 0.46 |
| 2016 | 0.69 | 0.53 |
| 2017 | 0.70 | 0.54 |
| 2018 | 0.73 | 0.76 |
| 2019 | 0.76 | 0.61 |
| 2020 | 0.77 | 0.69 |
| 2021 | 0.78 | 0.65 |
| 2022 | 0.78 | 0.67 |
| 2023 | 0.35 | 0.70 |
| 2024 | 0.41 | 0.67 |
| 2025 | 0.36 | 0.71 |
| 2026 | 0.28 | 0.66 |
asset source
Material Symbols vaping_rooms SVG
Material Symbols by Google
Unofficial clarity analysis. PictoClarity is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Google. Material Symbols are provided by Google under their published license.
Open sourcepublic evidence
Prevalence, Trends, and Harm Perception Associated with E-Cigarettes and Vaping among Adolescents in Saudi Arabia
OpenAlex / 2023-2023
Evidence query: vaping icon comprehension.
Open sourcepublic evidence
The Internet Journal of Law, Healthcare and Ethics
OpenAlex / 2014-2014
Evidence query: vaping icon comprehension.
Open sourcepublic evidence
Evaluating text, icon, and graphic nutrition labels: An eye tracking experiment with Latino adults in the US
OpenAlex / 2024-2024
Evidence query: vaping icon comprehension.
Open sourcepublic evidence
Comprehensive Review of Artificial Neural Network Applications to Pattern Recognition
OpenAlex / 2019-2019
Evidence query: vaping room recognition.
Open sourcepublic evidence
Inhalation Toxicology of Vaping Products and Implications for Pulmonary Health
OpenAlex / 2020-2020
Evidence query: vaping room recognition.
Open sourcepublic evidence
Update: Interim Guidance for Health Care Providers Evaluating and Caring for Patients with Suspected E-cigarette, or Vaping, Product Use Associated Lung Injury — United States, October 2019
OpenAlex / 2019-2019
Evidence query: vaping room recognition.
Open sourcehistorical evidence
Google Books Ngram annual buckets: vaping
Google Books Ngram / 1996-2026
Annual extraction returned 3853238 records across 27 active years.
Open sourcehistorical evidence
OpenAlex annual buckets: vaping icon comprehension
OpenAlex / 1996-2026
Annual extraction returned 60 records across 10 active years.
Open sourcehistorical evidence
Google Books Ngram annual buckets: vaping rooms
Google Books Ngram / 1996-2026
Annual extraction returned 0 records across 0 active years.
Open sourcehistorical evidence
OpenAlex annual buckets: vaping rooms
OpenAlex / 1996-2026
Annual extraction returned 1054 records across 20 active years.
Open source[ TECHNICAL SCORECARD ]
The Metrics Behind The Case.
PCS
0.69
PictoClarity Score
STS
0.57
Semantic Transparency Score
CRI
0.57
Confusion Risk Index
VRS
0.76
Visual Readability Score
PCH
1.00
Perceptual Cohesion
RTS
0.79
Readability Test Score
SRS
0.70
Scale Robustness Score
BRS
0.84
Blur Robustness Score
TCS
0.78
Target Contrast Stability
SDS
0.74
Stroke Durability Score
SFS
0.76
Silhouette Fidelity Score
NDS
1.00
Negative Detail Score
BBS
0.32
Bounding Box Balance
CPS
1.00
Compression Preservation
PDS
1.00
Pixel Density Suitability
ORS
0.76
Orientation Robustness
CAS
0.60
Color Accessibility Score
RRS
0.63
Referent Recognition Score
FAS
0.68
Functional Association Score
SOS
0.10
Semantic Obsolescence Score
CSS
0.39
Cultural Saturation Score
ERS
0.47
Evidence Reliability Score
MTS
0.46
Metaphor Transfer Score
TDS
0.15
Temporal Decay Score
GDS
0.13
Generational Divide Score
CLL
0.39
Convention Learning Load
NTR
0.51
Neurocognitive Transfer Risk
SPS
0.52
Symbol Persistence Score
OBS
0.19
Obsolescence Signal
CTS
0.00
Cohort Transfer Slope
[ RECOMMENDED NEXT ACTIONS ]
What Improves This Pictogram.
Action
Run representative user testing before publication.
Action
Keep the text label visible until semantic transparency is proven.
Action
Keep visible label support when scores sit below strong clarity.
Action
Validate interpretation with representative users before high-risk release.
[ Private testing / Admin invite ]
Request an invite for pictogram clarity screening.
Access stays invite-only during private testing.
Requests feed the admin invite queue.
Useful context helps select early pilots.