[ PICTOGRAM CASE HISTORY ]
Material Symbols Sports Golf Icon (Outlined). Needs intervention.
Visible referent: sports golf. Intended message: The icon must communicate Sports Golf in a digital interface.. The report separates observed asset evidence, submitted context, and public evidence signals.
0.64
PCS
0.41
CLL
0.48
NTR
[ FEATURED PICTOGRAM ]
pictoclarity / material-symbols-sports-golf-outlined
Output - Material Symbols Sports Golf Icon (Outlined)
Assessing the communicative effectiveness of the Sports Golf icon
This reviewed catalog report estimates clarity for Sports Golf in default interface contexts. Scores are screening estimates and do not replace user testing.
0.64
PCS
PictoClarity Score
0.41
CLL
Convention Learning Load
0.48
NTR
Neurocognitive Transfer Risk
[ HOW THE CASE READS ]
From Input To Public Evidence.
The application stores structured evidence. The public page turns it into a readable pictogram case history.
01
Submitted Context
Framework output for the Material Symbols Sports Golf icon in the outlined style.
02
Primary Finding
Primary referent: sports golf.
03
Metric Reading
Implied function: The icon must communicate Sports Golf in a digital interface..
04
Public Recommendation
Conduct representative user testing across diverse user groups to validate comprehension and reduce confusion risks, especially in contexts lacking supporting labels or cues.
[ EVIDENCE SCREENING ]
What The Estimate Surfaces.
Semantic Transparency Score
Input
Expected
Estimated
0.60
Confusion Risk Index
Input
Possible
Estimated
0.51
Readability Test Score
Input
Visual
Estimated
0.75
PictoClarity Score
Input
Estimated
Estimated
0.64
Needs intervention 0.64
The pictogram carries meaningful clarity risk. The estimate applies to this pictogram, this meaning, and this public context.
Last Reviewed
Jun 24, 2026
[ SCORE SCALE ]
The Public Verdict Has A Range.
The level explains the estimated context. It is not a certification.
0.80-1.00
Strong clarity
The pictogram communicates well in this context.
Use it, then keep testing with real users.
0.65-0.79
Usable with support
The pictogram works with labels or context.
Pair it with text and monitor interpretation.
0.50-0.64
Needs intervention
Current report
The pictogram carries meaningful clarity risk.
Improve the symbol before relying on it.
0.00-0.49
Not reliable
The pictogram does not communicate enough alone.
Replace it or add strong alternative support.
[ CONVERGENCE PROFILE ]
Where Meaning Converges.
The profile compares visual evidence, semantic extraction, cultural recognition, time, and cognitive context. It describes estimated convergence, not universal validity.
Convergent meaning profile
The radar shows where meaning converges. It does not certify universal validity.
Area
0.33
Balance
0.81
Perceptual
0.75
Semantic
0.60
Functional
0.60
Cultural
0.46
Temporal
0.50
Neurocognitive
0.59
Context Independence
0.63
Collective Resonance
0.45
Weakest Axis
Collective Resonance
How strongly public evidence supports shared recognition and persistence.
Strongest Axis
Perceptual Convergence
How strongly visual form survives size, blur, contrast, and detail loss.
| Axis | Score | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Perceptual Convergence | 0.75 | How strongly visual form survives size, blur, contrast, and detail loss. |
| Semantic Convergence | 0.60 | How strongly extracted meaning converges on one interpretation. |
| Functional Convergence | 0.60 | How strongly the symbol maps to the intended function. |
| Cultural Convergence | 0.46 | How strongly recognition holds across cultural evidence and assumptions. |
| Temporal Convergence | 0.50 | How strongly meaning persists over time without semantic decay. |
| Neurocognitive Convergence | 0.59 | How strongly the symbol follows AAC pictogram reading: transparent referent, concrete action, low convention load, and support. |
| Context Independence | 0.63 | How strongly meaning survives without external labels or placement cues. |
| Collective Resonance | 0.45 | How strongly public evidence supports shared recognition and persistence. |
Evidence Notes.
8 Findings Published
Evidence
Primary referent: sports golf.
Evidence
Implied function: The icon must communicate Sports Golf in a digital interface..
Evidence
Metaphor type: functional.
Evidence
The icon effectively represents the sport of golf with a clear primary referent and functional meaning aligned to digital interface use.
Evidence
Visual metrics indicate strong perceptual clarity and resilience to size, blur, and contrast loss, supporting good visual recognition (Perceptual Convergence score 0.75).
Evidence
Semantic and functional convergence scores (0.6 each) show moderate clarity in meaning and function mapping, but some risk of confusion with other ball sports or generic ball icons exists.
Evidence
Cultural convergence is relatively weak (0.46), reflecting moderate cultural recognition and saturation, with evidence reliability and symbol persistence scores also moderate to low, indicating limited broad cultural embedding.
Evidence
Temporal convergence (0.5) suggests moderate persistence of meaning over time, with some semantic obsolescence and temporal decay present.
[ TRANSFER / METRIC CHART ]
Public evidence trend
The chart shows public evidence buckets by evidence year. Cohort breakpoints appear only when an aging referent is active.
Public evidence trend
Evidence year: 2026
Evaluation
Reference point.
X axis: Evidence year
| Evidence year | Semantic Transparency | Cultural Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.77 | 0.75 |
| 1997 | 0.78 | 0.76 |
| 1998 | 0.78 | 0.73 |
| 1999 | 0.77 | 0.73 |
| 2000 | 0.78 | 0.73 |
| 2001 | 0.78 | 0.74 |
| 2002 | 0.78 | 0.73 |
| 2003 | 0.78 | 0.75 |
| 2004 | 0.78 | 0.74 |
| 2005 | 0.78 | 0.74 |
| 2006 | 0.78 | 0.74 |
| 2007 | 0.77 | 0.74 |
| 2008 | 0.78 | 0.74 |
| 2009 | 0.77 | 0.75 |
| 2010 | 0.78 | 0.75 |
| 2011 | 0.77 | 0.74 |
| 2012 | 0.77 | 0.73 |
| 2013 | 0.77 | 0.75 |
| 2014 | 0.77 | 0.75 |
| 2015 | 0.77 | 0.74 |
| 2016 | 0.77 | 0.76 |
| 2017 | 0.76 | 0.74 |
| 2018 | 0.77 | 0.74 |
| 2019 | 0.77 | 0.74 |
| 2020 | 0.77 | 0.74 |
| 2021 | 0.78 | 0.74 |
| 2022 | 0.77 | 0.75 |
| 2023 | 0.42 | 0.59 |
| 2024 | 0.44 | 0.59 |
| 2025 | 0.42 | 0.60 |
| 2026 | 0.39 | 0.58 |
asset source
Material Symbols sports_golf SVG
Material Symbols by Google
Unofficial clarity analysis. PictoClarity is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Google. Material Symbols are provided by Google under their published license.
Open sourcepublic evidence
Can Speaker Gaze Modulate Syntactic Structuring and Thematic Role Assignment during Spoken Sentence Comprehension?
OpenAlex / 2012-2012
Evidence query: golf icon comprehension.
Open sourcepublic evidence
Comprehension of rapidly transforming landscapes of Central and Eastern Europe in the 20th century
OpenAlex / 2004-2004
Evidence query: golf icon comprehension.
Open sourcepublic evidence
The impact of visual cues on item response in video-mediated tests of foreign language listening comprehension
OpenAlex / 2017-2017
Evidence query: golf icon comprehension.
Open sourcepublic evidence
Glyph-based Visualization: Foundations, Design Guidelines, Techniques and Applications
OpenAlex / 2012-2012
Evidence query: sports ball pictogram recognition.
Open sourcepublic evidence
Glyph Sorting: Interactive Visualization for Multi-dimensional Data
OpenAlex / 2013-2013
Evidence query: sports ball pictogram recognition.
Open sourcepublic evidence
Cognitive training with and without additional physical activity in healthy older adults: cognitive effects, neurobiological mechanisms, and prediction of training success
OpenAlex / 2015-2015
Evidence query: sports ball pictogram recognition.
Open sourcepublic evidence
The relationships between golf and health: a scoping review
OpenAlex / 2016-2016
Evidence query: golf tee meaning.
Open sourcehistorical evidence
Google Books Ngram annual buckets: golf
Google Books Ngram / 1996-2026
Annual extraction returned 21557275 records across 27 active years.
Open sourcehistorical evidence
OpenAlex annual buckets: golf icon comprehension
OpenAlex / 1996-2026
Annual extraction returned 693 records across 31 active years.
Open sourcehistorical evidence
Google Books Ngram annual buckets: sports ball
Google Books Ngram / 1996-2026
Annual extraction returned 13362696 records across 27 active years.
Open sourcehistorical evidence
OpenAlex annual buckets: sports ball pictogram recognition
OpenAlex / 1996-2026
Annual extraction returned 122 records across 20 active years.
Open sourcehistorical evidence
Google Books Ngram annual buckets: sports golf
Google Books Ngram / 1996-2026
Annual extraction returned 6271269 records across 25 active years.
Open sourcehistorical evidence
OpenAlex annual buckets: sports golf
OpenAlex / 1996-2026
Annual extraction returned 45960 records across 31 active years.
Open source[ TECHNICAL SCORECARD ]
The Metrics Behind The Case.
PCS
0.64
PictoClarity Score
STS
0.60
Semantic Transparency Score
CRI
0.51
Confusion Risk Index
VRS
0.72
Visual Readability Score
PCH
1.00
Perceptual Cohesion
RTS
0.75
Readability Test Score
SRS
0.70
Scale Robustness Score
BRS
0.84
Blur Robustness Score
TCS
0.78
Target Contrast Stability
SDS
0.74
Stroke Durability Score
SFS
0.66
Silhouette Fidelity Score
NDS
1.00
Negative Detail Score
BBS
0.02
Bounding Box Balance
CPS
1.00
Compression Preservation
PDS
1.00
Pixel Density Suitability
ORS
0.65
Orientation Robustness
CAS
0.60
Color Accessibility Score
RRS
0.52
Referent Recognition Score
FAS
0.63
Functional Association Score
SOS
0.33
Semantic Obsolescence Score
CSS
0.46
Cultural Saturation Score
ERS
0.35
Evidence Reliability Score
MTS
0.40
Metaphor Transfer Score
TDS
0.50
Temporal Decay Score
GDS
0.26
Generational Divide Score
CLL
0.41
Convention Learning Load
NTR
0.48
Neurocognitive Transfer Risk
SPS
0.42
Symbol Persistence Score
OBS
0.19
Obsolescence Signal
CTS
0.00
Cohort Transfer Slope
[ RECOMMENDED NEXT ACTIONS ]
What Improves This Pictogram.
Action
Conduct representative user testing across diverse user groups to validate comprehension and reduce confusion risks, especially in contexts lacking supporting labels or cues.
Action
Maintain visible text labels or tooltips alongside the icon until semantic transparency and user familiarity are confirmed through testing.
Action
Consider enhancing contextual cues or grouping with related icons to reduce confusion with other ball sports or generic ball symbols.
Action
Monitor cultural and temporal trends to ensure the icon remains relevant and recognizable, updating design if semantic obsolescence increases.
Action
Improve cultural saturation by integrating the icon consistently across platforms and providing user education where feasible.
[ Private testing / Admin invite ]
Request an invite for pictogram clarity screening.
Access stays invite-only during private testing.
Requests feed the admin invite queue.
Useful context helps select early pilots.