[ PICTOGRAM CASE HISTORY ]
Material Symbols Lte Plus Mobiledata Badge Icon (Outlined). Needs intervention.
Visible referent: lte plus mobiledata badge. Intended message: The icon must communicate Lte Plus Mobiledata Badge in a digital interface.. The report separates observed asset evidence, submitted context, and public evidence signals.
0.54
PCS
0.68
CLL
0.79
NTR
[ FEATURED PICTOGRAM ]
pictoclarity / material-symbols-lte-plus-mobiledata-badge-outlined
Output - Material Symbols Lte Plus Mobiledata Badge Icon (Outlined)
Assessing the communicative effectiveness of the Lte Plus Mobiledata Badge icon
This reviewed catalog report estimates clarity for Lte Plus Mobiledata Badge in default interface contexts. Scores are screening estimates and do not replace user testing.
0.54
PCS
PictoClarity Score
0.68
CLL
Convention Learning Load
0.79
NTR
Neurocognitive Transfer Risk
[ HOW THE CASE READS ]
From Input To Public Evidence.
The application stores structured evidence. The public page turns it into a readable pictogram case history.
01
Submitted Context
Framework output for the Material Symbols Lte Plus Mobiledata Badge icon in the outlined style.
02
Primary Finding
Primary referent: lte plus mobiledata badge.
03
Metric Reading
Implied function: The icon must communicate Lte Plus Mobiledata Badge in a digital interface..
04
Public Recommendation
Maintain visible text labels or tooltips when using this icon, especially in compact or crowded interfaces, to reduce confusion and support comprehension.
[ EVIDENCE SCREENING ]
What The Estimate Surfaces.
Semantic Transparency Score
Input
Expected
Estimated
0.44
Confusion Risk Index
Input
Possible
Estimated
0.69
Readability Test Score
Input
Visual
Estimated
0.75
PictoClarity Score
Input
Estimated
Estimated
0.54
Needs intervention 0.54
The pictogram carries meaningful clarity risk. The estimate applies to this pictogram, this meaning, and this public context.
Last Reviewed
Jun 24, 2026
[ SCORE SCALE ]
The Public Verdict Has A Range.
The level explains the estimated context. It is not a certification.
0.80-1.00
Strong clarity
The pictogram communicates well in this context.
Use it, then keep testing with real users.
0.65-0.79
Usable with support
The pictogram works with labels or context.
Pair it with text and monitor interpretation.
0.50-0.64
Needs intervention
Current report
The pictogram carries meaningful clarity risk.
Improve the symbol before relying on it.
0.00-0.49
Not reliable
The pictogram does not communicate enough alone.
Replace it or add strong alternative support.
[ CONVERGENCE PROFILE ]
Where Meaning Converges.
The profile compares visual evidence, semantic extraction, cultural recognition, time, and cognitive context. It describes estimated convergence, not universal validity.
Convergent meaning profile
The radar shows where meaning converges. It does not certify universal validity.
Area
0.17
Balance
0.67
Perceptual
0.75
Semantic
0.44
Functional
0.46
Cultural
0.24
Temporal
0.49
Neurocognitive
0.42
Context Independence
0.49
Collective Resonance
0.16
Weakest Axis
Collective Resonance
How strongly public evidence supports shared recognition and persistence.
Strongest Axis
Perceptual Convergence
How strongly visual form survives size, blur, contrast, and detail loss.
| Axis | Score | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Perceptual Convergence | 0.75 | How strongly visual form survives size, blur, contrast, and detail loss. |
| Semantic Convergence | 0.44 | How strongly extracted meaning converges on one interpretation. |
| Functional Convergence | 0.46 | How strongly the symbol maps to the intended function. |
| Cultural Convergence | 0.24 | How strongly recognition holds across cultural evidence and assumptions. |
| Temporal Convergence | 0.49 | How strongly meaning persists over time without semantic decay. |
| Neurocognitive Convergence | 0.42 | How strongly the symbol follows AAC pictogram reading: transparent referent, concrete action, low convention load, and support. |
| Context Independence | 0.49 | How strongly meaning survives without external labels or placement cues. |
| Collective Resonance | 0.16 | How strongly public evidence supports shared recognition and persistence. |
Evidence Notes.
8 Findings Published
Evidence
Primary referent: lte plus mobiledata badge.
Evidence
Implied function: The icon must communicate Lte Plus Mobiledata Badge in a digital interface..
Evidence
Metaphor type: functional.
Evidence
The icon's primary referent is the LTE Plus Mobiledata Badge, intended to communicate mobile data connectivity status in digital interfaces.
Evidence
Visual form scores strongly on perceptual robustness (0.75), indicating good survival of size, blur, contrast, and detail loss.
Evidence
Semantic (0.44) and functional (0.46) convergence scores are moderate, showing partial clarity in meaning and function mapping.
Evidence
Cultural convergence is low (0.24), reflecting weak shared recognition and limited cultural evidence supporting the symbol.
Evidence
Temporal convergence (0.49) suggests moderate persistence of meaning over time without strong semantic decay.
[ TRANSFER / METRIC CHART ]
Public evidence trend
The chart shows public evidence buckets by evidence year. Cohort breakpoints appear only when an aging referent is active.
Public evidence trend
Evidence year: 2026
Evaluation
Reference point.
X axis: Evidence year
| Evidence year | Semantic Transparency | Cultural Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| 1997 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| 1998 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| 1999 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| 2000 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| 2001 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| 2002 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| 2003 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| 2004 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| 2005 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| 2006 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| 2007 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| 2008 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| 2009 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| 2010 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| 2011 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| 2012 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| 2013 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| 2014 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| 2015 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| 2016 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| 2017 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| 2018 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| 2019 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| 2020 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| 2021 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| 2022 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| 2023 | 0.00 | 0.24 |
| 2024 | 0.00 | 0.24 |
| 2025 | 0.00 | 0.24 |
| 2026 | 0.00 | 0.24 |
asset source
Material Symbols lte_plus_mobiledata_badge SVG
Material Symbols by Google
Unofficial clarity analysis. PictoClarity is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Google. Material Symbols are provided by Google under their published license.
Open sourcehistorical evidence
Google Books Ngram annual buckets: lte plus
Google Books Ngram / 1996-2026
Annual extraction returned 0 records across 0 active years.
Open sourcehistorical evidence
Google Books Ngram annual buckets: mobile data badge
Google Books Ngram / 1996-2026
Annual extraction returned 0 records across 0 active years.
Open sourcehistorical evidence
Google Books Ngram annual buckets: lte plus mobiledata badge
Google Books Ngram / 1996-2026
Annual extraction returned 0 records across 0 active years.
Open sourcehistorical evidence
Google Books Ngram annual buckets: lte plus mobiledata
Google Books Ngram / 1996-2026
Annual extraction returned 0 records across 0 active years.
Open sourcehistorical evidence
Google Books Ngram annual buckets: plus mobiledata badge
Google Books Ngram / 1996-2026
Annual extraction returned 0 records across 0 active years.
Open sourcehistorical evidence
Google Books Ngram annual buckets: symbolic
Google Books Ngram / 1996-2026
Annual extraction returned 20696972 records across 27 active years.
Open source[ TECHNICAL SCORECARD ]
The Metrics Behind The Case.
PCS
0.54
PictoClarity Score
STS
0.44
Semantic Transparency Score
CRI
0.69
Confusion Risk Index
VRS
0.73
Visual Readability Score
PCH
1.00
Perceptual Cohesion
RTS
0.75
Readability Test Score
SRS
0.70
Scale Robustness Score
BRS
0.84
Blur Robustness Score
TCS
0.78
Target Contrast Stability
SDS
0.74
Stroke Durability Score
SFS
0.66
Silhouette Fidelity Score
NDS
1.00
Negative Detail Score
BBS
0.03
Bounding Box Balance
CPS
1.00
Compression Preservation
PDS
1.00
Pixel Density Suitability
ORS
0.66
Orientation Robustness
CAS
0.60
Color Accessibility Score
RRS
0.30
Referent Recognition Score
FAS
0.46
Functional Association Score
SOS
0.12
Semantic Obsolescence Score
CSS
0.01
Cultural Saturation Score
ERS
0.09
Evidence Reliability Score
MTS
0.13
Metaphor Transfer Score
TDS
0.18
Temporal Decay Score
GDS
0.20
Generational Divide Score
CLL
0.68
Convention Learning Load
NTR
0.79
Neurocognitive Transfer Risk
SPS
0.18
Symbol Persistence Score
OBS
0.19
Obsolescence Signal
CTS
0.00
Cohort Transfer Slope
[ RECOMMENDED NEXT ACTIONS ]
What Improves This Pictogram.
Action
Maintain visible text labels or tooltips when using this icon, especially in compact or crowded interfaces, to reduce confusion and support comprehension.
Action
Conduct forced-choice user testing comparing this icon against neighboring or similar mobile network status icons to ensure users correctly identify the intended meaning and state.
Action
Include neurodivergent and diverse user groups in testing to assess object-to-action transfer and convention learning load, ensuring accessibility and broad comprehension.
Action
Validate whether users infer the icon's function directly or rely on learned conventions, and adjust design or support accordingly to improve semantic transparency.
Action
Prior to deployment, run representative user testing to confirm the icon's clarity, especially in contexts where it appears alone without supporting labels or contextual cues.
[ Private testing / Admin invite ]
Request an invite for pictogram clarity screening.
Access stays invite-only during private testing.
Requests feed the admin invite queue.
Useful context helps select early pilots.