[ PICTOGRAM CASE HISTORY ]

Material Symbols Border All.

Outlined icon

Usable with support

Visible referent: border all. Intended message: The icon must communicate Border All in a digital interface.. The report separates observed asset evidence, submitted context, and public evidence signals.

0.68

PCS

0.40

CLL

0.51

NTR

[ FEATURED PICTOGRAM ]

Pictogram contrast preview
Paper
Ink

pictoclarity / material-symbols-border-all-outlined

Output - Material Symbols Border All Icon (Outlined)

Assessing the communicative effectiveness of the Border All icon

This reviewed catalog report estimates clarity for Border All in default interface contexts. Scores are screening estimates and do not replace user testing.

Mobile appWeb appDesktop app

0.68

PCS

PictoClarity Score

0.40

CLL

Convention Learning Load

0.51

NTR

Neurocognitive Transfer Risk

Read Evidence→

[ HOW THE CASE READS ]

From Input To Public Evidence.

The application stores structured evidence. The public page turns it into a readable pictogram case history.

01

Submitted Context

Framework output for the Material Symbols Border All icon in the outlined style.

02

Primary Finding

Primary referent: border all.

03

Metric Reading

Implied function: The icon must communicate Border All in a digital interface..

04

Public Recommendation

Run representative user testing before publication.

[ EVIDENCE SCREENING ]

What The Estimate Surfaces.

Semantic Transparency Score

Input

Expected

→

Estimated

0.62

Confusion Risk Index

Input

Possible

→

Estimated

0.55

Readability Test Score

Input

Visual

→

Estimated

0.75

PictoClarity Score

Input

Estimated

→

Estimated

0.68

Usable with support 0.68

The pictogram works with labels or context. The estimate applies to this pictogram, this meaning, and this public context.

Last Reviewed

Jun 24, 2026

[ SCORE SCALE ]

The Public Verdict Has A Range.

The level explains the estimated context. It is not a certification.

0.80-1.00

Strong clarity

The pictogram communicates well in this context.

Use it, then keep testing with real users.

0.65-0.79

Usable with support

Current report

The pictogram works with labels or context.

Pair it with text and monitor interpretation.

0.50-0.64

Needs intervention

The pictogram carries meaningful clarity risk.

Improve the symbol before relying on it.

0.00-0.49

Not reliable

The pictogram does not communicate enough alone.

Replace it or add strong alternative support.

[ CONVERGENCE PROFILE ]

Where Meaning Converges.

The profile compares visual evidence, semantic extraction, cultural recognition, time, and cognitive context. It describes estimated convergence, not universal validity.

Convergent meaning profile

The radar shows where meaning converges. It does not certify universal validity.

Area

0.39

Balance

0.88

Perceptual

0.75

Semantic

0.62

Functional

0.67

Cultural

0.56

Temporal

0.62

Neurocognitive

0.56

Context Independence

0.64

Collective Resonance

0.56

Weakest Axis

Cultural Convergence

How strongly recognition holds across cultural evidence and assumptions.

Strongest Axis

Perceptual Convergence

How strongly visual form survives size, blur, contrast, and detail loss.

Convergent meaning profile
AxisScoreDescription
Perceptual Convergence0.75How strongly visual form survives size, blur, contrast, and detail loss.
Semantic Convergence0.62How strongly extracted meaning converges on one interpretation.
Functional Convergence0.67How strongly the symbol maps to the intended function.
Cultural Convergence0.56How strongly recognition holds across cultural evidence and assumptions.
Temporal Convergence0.62How strongly meaning persists over time without semantic decay.
Neurocognitive Convergence0.56How strongly the symbol follows AAC pictogram reading: transparent referent, concrete action, low convention load, and support.
Context Independence0.64How strongly meaning survives without external labels or placement cues.
Collective Resonance0.56How strongly public evidence supports shared recognition and persistence.

Evidence Notes.

8 Findings Published

Evidence

Primary referent: border all.

Evidence

Implied function: The icon must communicate Border All in a digital interface..

Evidence

Metaphor type: functional.

Evidence

Functional meaning: The icon must communicate Border All in a digital interface..

Evidence

PCS total: 0.68.

Evidence

Weakest convergence axis: Cultural Convergence.

Evidence

Evidence warning: Annual Wikimedia Pageviews failed for "grid border icon comprehension": HTTP 404.

Evidence

Evidence warning: Annual Wikimedia Pageviews failed for "border all": HTTP 404.

[ TRANSFER / METRIC CHART ]

Public evidence trend

The chart shows public evidence buckets by evidence year. Cohort breakpoints appear only when an aging referent is active.

Public evidence trend

Evidence year: 2026

Evaluation

Reference point.

X axis: Evidence year

Public evidence trend
Evidence yearSemantic TransparencyCultural Evidence
19960.740.73
19970.730.74
19980.740.74
19990.740.74
20000.710.74
20010.780.74
20020.700.74
20030.690.74
20040.730.74
20050.700.74
20060.690.74
20070.720.75
20080.700.74
20090.660.74
20100.710.75
20110.680.75
20120.720.74
20130.700.75
20140.700.75
20150.700.76
20160.720.75
20170.690.76
20180.680.75
20190.630.75
20200.670.75
20210.660.75
20220.700.74
20230.450.70
20240.470.69
20250.460.69
20260.430.66
Cohort transfer is inactive for this published report. The chart above uses evidence-year or metric data instead.

asset source

Material Symbols border_all SVG

Material Symbols by Google

Unofficial clarity analysis. PictoClarity is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Google. Material Symbols are provided by Google under their published license.

Open source

public evidence

Visual narrative comprehension: Universal or not?

OpenAlex / 2019-2019

Evidence query: grid border icon comprehension.

Open source

public evidence

The Domain-General Multiple Demand (MD) Network Does Not Support Core Aspects of Language Comprehension: A Large-Scale fMRI Investigation

OpenAlex / 2020-2020

Evidence query: grid border icon comprehension.

Open source

public evidence

Improving Hazard Map Comprehension for Protective Action Decision Making

OpenAlex / 2020-2020

Evidence query: grid border icon comprehension.

Open source

public evidence

Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using CellChat

OpenAlex / 2021-2021

Evidence query: table cell border recognition.

Open source

public evidence

Selective Search for Object Recognition

OpenAlex / 2013-2013

Evidence query: table cell border recognition.

Open source

public evidence

Action recognition in the premotor cortex

OpenAlex / 1996-1996

Evidence query: table cell border recognition.

Open source

historical evidence

Google Books Ngram annual buckets: grid border

Google Books Ngram / 1996-2026

Annual extraction returned 4610950 records across 27 active years.

Open source

historical evidence

OpenAlex annual buckets: grid border icon comprehension

OpenAlex / 1996-2026

Annual extraction returned 1574 records across 31 active years.

Open source

historical evidence

Google Books Ngram annual buckets: border all

Google Books Ngram / 1996-2026

Annual extraction returned 18171317 records across 27 active years.

Open source

historical evidence

OpenAlex annual buckets: border all

OpenAlex / 1996-2026

Annual extraction returned 2097721 records across 31 active years.

Open source

[ TECHNICAL SCORECARD ]

The Metrics Behind The Case.

PCS

0.68

PictoClarity Score

STS

0.62

Semantic Transparency Score

CRI

0.55

Confusion Risk Index

VRS

0.73

Visual Readability Score

PCH

1.00

Perceptual Cohesion

RTS

0.75

Readability Test Score

SRS

0.70

Scale Robustness Score

BRS

0.84

Blur Robustness Score

TCS

0.78

Target Contrast Stability

SDS

0.74

Stroke Durability Score

SFS

0.66

Silhouette Fidelity Score

NDS

1.00

Negative Detail Score

BBS

0.03

Bounding Box Balance

CPS

1.00

Compression Preservation

PDS

1.00

Pixel Density Suitability

ORS

0.66

Orientation Robustness

CAS

0.60

Color Accessibility Score

RRS

0.64

Referent Recognition Score

FAS

0.73

Functional Association Score

SOS

0.22

Semantic Obsolescence Score

CSS

0.52

Cultural Saturation Score

ERS

0.56

Evidence Reliability Score

MTS

0.50

Metaphor Transfer Score

TDS

0.36

Temporal Decay Score

GDS

0.18

Generational Divide Score

CLL

0.40

Convention Learning Load

NTR

0.51

Neurocognitive Transfer Risk

SPS

0.54

Symbol Persistence Score

OBS

0.19

Obsolescence Signal

CTS

0.00

Cohort Transfer Slope

[ RECOMMENDED NEXT ACTIONS ]

What Improves This Pictogram.

Action

Run representative user testing before publication.

Action

Keep the text label visible until semantic transparency is proven.

Action

Keep visible label support when scores sit below strong clarity.

Action

Validate interpretation with representative users before high-risk release.

[ Private testing / Admin invite ]

Request an invite for pictogram clarity screening.

Access stays invite-only during private testing.

Requests feed the admin invite queue.

Useful context helps select early pilots.