[ Framework Metric ]

NTR: Neurocognitive Transfer Risk.

A risk score for fragile object-to-action transfer across cognitive profiles.

Category

Foundational metric

Framework

Definition

NTR measures how fragile the transfer is from visible referent to intended action, using AAC-informed pictogram reading rules.

Core Idea

Recognition is not transfer.

Recognizing a symbol does not imply successful communication of the intended meaning or action.

[ How To Read It ]

What The Metric Measures.

The reading applies to the submitted pictogram, expected message, user group, and evidence window.

Whether a user can move from seeing the object to understanding the action.

How abstract, legacy, indirect, or convention-heavy the mapping is.

Whether labels or contextual cues are needed for safer communication.

High Reading

A high NTR means recognition of the visible object does not reliably produce the intended action meaning.

Low Reading

A low NTR means the visible referent, action mapping, and support cues make transfer more direct.

[ Limits ]

What It Does Not Claim.

NTR estimates transfer risk; it does not diagnose users.

NTR does not replace AAC specialist review or user testing.

NTR depends on the submitted context and expected user group.

[ Examples ]

How It Appears In Reports.

A storage object used as an interface action can have high NTR when the action depends on learned convention.

A concrete object with a visible, direct action cue can reduce NTR.

[ Related Metrics ]

Meaning Transfer Is A System.