[ Set report ]
Designers Italia Icons
Aggregate clarity reading from the published reports in this set.
[ Analysis ]
Designers Italia Icons coverage analysis.
This view summarizes published reviewed reports. It highlights where the catalog reads clearly, where risk concentrates, and which style variants diverge.
Updated Jul 6, 2026, 8:21 PM
Browse directory
The directory contains every published pictogram with search, style filters, and report links.
Public-sector screening
AAC baseline constraints are part of this analysis.
Designers Italia reports are read as public-service symbols, not decorative UI icons. The default screening context includes mobile, web, and standalone AAC-baseline communication use.
This remains screening evidence. It does not certify AAC comprehension or institutional endorsement.
Support model
No text label is assumed. The symbol is assessed as interpretable on its own.
Display floor
Large touch target or 24px UI minimum.
Risk lens
Weak labels, placement, or context can create wrong service or action transfer.
Avg PCS
0.67
Usable with support average
Families
179
179 style reports
Below support
22%
39 reports
Source coverage
100%
178 source icons
Baselines
100%
179 stored
Convergence
Aggregate radar profile
This radar averages stored convergence axes across the published reports in the icon set.
Designers Italia Icons aggregate convergence
The radar shows where meaning converges. It does not certify universal validity.
Area
0.33
Balance
0.82
Perceptual
0.79
Semantic
0.56
Functional
0.61
Cultural
0.49
Temporal
0.58
Neurocognitive
0.52
Context Independence
0.60
Collective Resonance
0.48
Weakest Axis
Collective Resonance
How strongly public evidence supports shared recognition and persistence.
Strongest Axis
Perceptual Convergence
How strongly visual form survives size, blur, contrast, and detail loss.
| Axis | Score | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Perceptual Convergence | 0.79 | How strongly visual form survives size, blur, contrast, and detail loss. |
| Semantic Convergence | 0.56 | How strongly extracted meaning converges on one interpretation. |
| Functional Convergence | 0.61 | How strongly the symbol maps to the intended function. |
| Cultural Convergence | 0.49 | How strongly recognition holds across cultural evidence and assumptions. |
| Temporal Convergence | 0.58 | How strongly meaning persists over time without semantic decay. |
| Neurocognitive Convergence | 0.52 | How strongly the symbol follows AAC pictogram reading: transparent referent, concrete action, low convention load, and support. |
| Context Independence | 0.60 | How strongly meaning survives without external labels or placement cues. |
| Collective Resonance | 0.48 | How strongly public evidence supports shared recognition and persistence. |
PCS levels
How the catalog reads
Scores are grouped by readable clarity level, not only by number.
Strong clarity
0.80-1.00
00%
Usable with support
0.65-0.79
14078%
Needs intervention
0.50-0.64
3922%
Not reliable
0.00-0.49
00%
Metrics
Framework signals
Averages summarize published reports for this icon set.
PictoClarity Score
PCS / 179 reports
0.67
Semantic transparency
STS / 179 reports
0.56
Confusion risk
CRI / 179 reports
0.58
Neurocognitive risk
NTR / 179 reports
0.53
Evidence reliability
ERS / 179 reports
0.46
Best and worst
Useful extremes
These entries make the range of the catalog easier to inspect.
Highest PCS
Styles
Style-level reading
Style summaries reveal whether a variant family changes clarity.
Variant spread
Pictograms with style disagreement
These families have the widest PCS difference across comparable published styles.
No meaningful style disagreement is visible in the published coverage.